Hey team, I’m trying to evaluate whether the v3 core solution is the right database for my product, but I’m seeing poor performance and I suspect I might be doing something wrong.
I work at a telecom company where we’re measuring 4G cells.
For cells, our tags are cell id and node id, with ~20 fields.
For UEs, we use ue id, cell id, and node id as tags, with ~25 fields.
Data precision is 1 second.
Most queries are aggregations over the last 10 seconds for specific cells or UEs.
The database is running on bare metal (HP DL360) with 32 CPUs and 32 GB memory. Queries are consistently taking over 1 second (not a network issue). Writes are asynchronous across N TCP sessions, but acknowledgments often take >500 ms.
What can I do to improve this? Or is InfluxDB maybe not the right solution for this kind of workload?
Hi @DanShmirer InfluxDB 3 Core can certainly handle your requirements with ease, however few things to bear in mind:
Your query time frame is within 72 hour window, if it’s beyond then suggest trying out InfluxDB 3 Enterprise (30 day free trial to try just with your email). Our engineers can also help in this case.
Hi Suyash, thanks for your reply! I’m still unclear on what’s causing the slow queries (>1s for 10s windows) and high write acks (>500 ms). Beyond batching, could you point me to specific schema or config issues (tags, shard setup, durability, etc.) that might explain this? Just trying to understand if this is tuning on my side or a Core limitation.