# InfluxDB evaluation scenario - memory/performance issue

**URL:** <https://community.influxdata.com/t/influxdb-evaluation-scenario-memory-performance-issue/15222>\
**Category:** Store\
**Created:** [July 13, 2020, 1:04pm UTC](https://community.influxdata.com/t/influxdb-evaluation-scenario-memory-performance-issue/15222 "2020-07-13T13:04:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![qootec](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/41988e/32.png) [@qootec](https://community.influxdata.com/u/qootec)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2020, 3:31pm UTC](https://community.influxdata.com/t/influxdb-evaluation-scenario-memory-performance-issue/15222/3 "2020-09-16T15:31:44Z")

</div>

Thanks for your reply. I have been putting this on hold for some time (holidays and other experiments).

The system has been changed a bit by now with respect to this post:  
Two measurements now:

- First: 1 tag (single value) and 1300 fields
- Second: 1 tag (single value) and 15 fields  
The rest of the properties is the same (sparse float matrix).

To point you to some of the issues we see:

- [Python query results in "Read timed out"](https://community.influxdata.com/t/python-query-results-in-read-timed-out/15802)
- [Out-of-memory on backup + queries](https://community.influxdata.com/t/out-of-memory-on-backup-queries/15994)

Do you have ideas?

Thanks,  
Johan (but not Scheepers, to whom you replied)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.influxdata.com/t/influxdb-evaluation-scenario-memory-performance-issue/15222)._
